ORIGINAL ARTICLE

JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2005; 6(6):568-574.

Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Alcoholic Patients: Can One Predict Early Pancreatic Tissue Abnormalities?

Fernanda Prata Borges Martins Thuler, Patrícia Piauilino da Costa, Gustavo Andrade de Paulo, Frank Shigueo Nakao, José Celso Ardengh, Angelo Paulo Ferrari

Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Context The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in early stages remains challenging and agreement between various methods is poor. Alcohol consumption is the most important cause of chronic pancreatitis.

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the endosonographic evidence of pancreatic disease in patients with alcohol abuse.

Setting Consecutive patients referred for endoscopic ultrasonography for various indications between May 2001 and December 2003.

Patients Two hundred twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. One hundred 89 patients were studied; 39 (17.1%) were excluded because the pancreas could not be completely assessed (n=23) or because a previous diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and/or pancreatic neoplasm was suspected (n=16).

Design Prospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: alcoholics (n=17) and non-alcoholics (n=172).

Main outcome measure The assessment of pancreatic disease according to parenchymal and ductal changes as previously described by Catalano and Sahai (scores 1 and 2, respectively).

Results The male:female ratio was 7.5 and 0.9 in the alcoholic and the non-alcoholic groups, respectively (P=0.002). Mean ages were 53.0 and 47.8 years, respectively (P=0.156). Alcoholic patients had significantly (P<0.001) more endosonographic abnormalities than non-alcoholics for both scores. A ROC curve comparison between patients and controls showed that the best specificity and sensitivity combination was obtained for the number of EUS features greater than 1 and 2 for the scores 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusion Alcoholic patients had significantly more endosonographic abnormalities reflecting possible early changes of chronic pancreatitis. By using reported scores, values up to 1 or 2 can be seen in patients with no risk for pancreatitis, suggesting that chronic pancreatitis should be considered only for scores equal to or greater than 2 or 3 for scores 1 and 2, respectively.

Full text: HTML format   PDF format
  Look up who cited this article

References

  1. Steer ML, Waxman I, Freedman S. Chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1482-90. [More details]

  2. Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:682-707. [More details]

  3. Talamini G, Bassi C, Falconi M, Sartori N, Salvia R, Rigo L, et al. Alcohol and smoking as risk factors in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 44:1303-11. [More details]

  4. Lin Y, Tamakoshi A, Hayakawa T, Ogawa M, Ohno Y. Associations of alcohol drinking and nutrient intake with chronic pancreatitis: findings from a case-control study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:2622-7. [More details]

  5. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease; Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. 7th ed. WB Saunders, 2002:465-78. [More details]

  6. Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:11-7. [More details]

  7. Sahai AV, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L, Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, van Velse A, et al. Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:18-25. [More details]

  8. Sahai AV. EUS and chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56(4 Suppl):S76-81. [More details]

  9. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RC, Ferrari AP Jr, Montes H, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:652-6. [More details]

  10. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:425-34. [More details]

  11. Wiersema MJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography of the pancreas: normal variation versus changes of early chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995; 5:487-96. [More details]

  12. Byrne MF, Jowell PS. Gastrointestinal imaging: endoscopic ultrasound. Gastroenterology 2002; 122:1631-48. [More details]

  13. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, Kochman ML, Sherman S, Kopecky KK. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy 1993; 25:555-64. [More details]

  14. Lees WR. Endoscopic ultrasonography of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123:123-9. [More details]

  15. Pezzilli R, Morselli-Labate AM, Miniero R, Barakat B, Fiocchi M, Cappelletti O. Simultaneous serum assays of lipase and interleukin-6 for early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Clin Chem 1999; 45:1762-7. [More details]

  16. Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Cavallini G, Ammann RW, Lankisch PG, Andersen JR, et al. Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Pancreatitis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1433-7. [More details]

  17. Niederau C, Grendell JH. Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1985; 88:1973-95. [More details]

  18. Bastid C, Sahel J, Filho M, Sarles H. Diameter of the main pancreatic duct in chronic calcifying pancreatitis. Measurement by ultrasonography versus pancreatography. Pancreas 1990; 5:524-7. [More details]

  19. Buscail L, Escourrou J, Moreau J, Delvaux M, Louvel D, Lapeyre F, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP. Pancreas 1995; 10:251-7. [More details]

  20. Hawes RH. Comparison of diagnostic modalities: EUS, ERCP, and fluid analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:S74-6. [More details]

  21. Lightdale CJ. Indications, contraindications, and complications of endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43:S15-9. [More details]

  22. Nattermann C, Goldschmidt AJ, Dancygier H. Endosonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparison between endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1993; 25:565-70. [More details]

  23. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski V, Chak A, Mallery S, Catalano MF, et al. The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:294-9. [More details]

  24. Sahai AV, Mishra G, Penman ID, Williams D, Wallace MB, Hadzijahic N, et al. EUS to detect evidence of pancreatic disease in patients with persistent or nonspecific dyspepsia. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52:153-9. [More details]

  25. Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasonography: changes of chronic pancreatitis in asymptomatic and symptomatic alcoholic patients. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:455-62. [More details]

  26. Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A, Pross M, Schulz HU, Malfertheiner P. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:507-11. [More details]

  27. Yusoff IF, Sahai AV. A prospective, quantitative assessment of the effect of ethanol and other variables on the endosonographic appearance of the pancreas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:405-9. [More details]

Keywords Diagnosis; Endosonography; Pancreatitis

Correspondence Angelo Paulo Ferrari: angelo@gastro.epm.br

JOP Home page